Malcolm Muhammad v. C. Stapleton; W. R. Hensley; Randy Mathena

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6724
MALCOLM MUHAMMAD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
C. STAPLETON; W. R. HENSLEY; RANDY MATHENA,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
M. STANFORD; B. RARIZEE; K. MASSEY; D. CRABTREE; DR. TATRO;
K. GIVENS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (7:11-cv-00610-SGW-RSB)
Submitted: August 20, 2012 Decided: August 23,2012
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcolm Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006) and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Muhammad v. Stapleton, No. 7:11-cv-
00610-SGW-RSB (W.D. Va. Feb. 29 & Apr. 11, 2012). We deny the
motion to file an amended complaint and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --