The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6673•United States of America v. Nathaniel Jones, a/k/a Devon Najee Hinton
12-6673Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 20, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6673
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NATHANIEL JONES, a/k/a Devon Najee Hinton,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:06-cr-00044-REP-1)
Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 20, 2012
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Jones appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18
U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error, given that Jones is ineligible for the
reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of
the district court. United States v. Jones, No. 3:06-cr-00044-
REP-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.