The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6670•William Bill Clark v. M. CHEESEBORO, Sargeant/H.R.R.J.
12-6670Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 1, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6670
WILLIAM BILL CLARK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
M. CHEESEBORO, Sargeant/H.R.R.J.; C/O SIMMONS, Corr.
Officer at H.R.R.J.; SGT. WARD, Sargeant at H.R.R.J.; MJO
LITTLEJOHN, Master Jail Officer/H.R.R.J.; C/O C. ROGERS,
Corr. Officer/Hearings; M.J.O. HANSLEY, Master Jail
Officer/H.R.R.J.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:11-cv-00097-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: September 21, 2012 Decided: November 1, 2012
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Bill Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville,
NORRIS & ST. CLAIR P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Bill Clark appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights
action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Clark v. Cheeseboro, No. 2:11-cv-00097-RAJ-TEM
(E.D. Va. Mar. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.