The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6595•Roger Lee Deal, Sr. v. Dr. Owens; Dr. Sami Hassen
12-6595Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 1, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6595
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. OWENS; DR. SAMI HASSEN,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
DR. KENNETH PRICE, JR.; HEAD DIRECTOR UTILIZATION REVIEW
BOARD,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:11-ct-03055-D)
Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roger Lee Deal, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Roger Lee Deal, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Deal v. Owens, No. 5:11-ct-03055-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 27,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.