United States of America v. Curry Donnell Ingram, a/k/a Peanut

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6563
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
CURRY DONNELL INGRAM, a/k/a Peanut,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (4:01-cr-00081-RAJ-1)
Submitted: July 30, 2012 Decided: August 14, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curry Donnell Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Curry Donnell Ingram appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for
a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Ingram, No.
4:01-cr-00081-RAJ-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 24, 2012). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --