The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6536•United States of America v. Leoditus A. Smith, a/k/a Leo
12-6536Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 31, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6536
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
LEODITUS A. SMITH, a/k/a Leo,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers,
District Judge. (3:09-cr-00158-6)
Submitted: May 24, 2012 Decided: May 31, 2012
Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leoditus A. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Franklin Adams,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Huntington, West Virginia;
Gary L. Call, Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Leoditus A. Smith appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction
of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Smith, No. 3:09-cr-00158-6
(S.D.W. Va. Feb. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.