The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6455•United States of America v. Brittany Simons
12-6455Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 6, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6455
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BRITTANY SIMONS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (3:08-cr-01057-CMC-6)
Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brittany Simons, Appellant Pro Se. James Chris Leventis, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Mark C. Moore, Stanley
Duane Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brittany Simons appeals the district court’s order
denying her motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18
U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error, given that Simons is ineligible for the
reduction that she seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment
of the district court. United States v. Simons, No. 3:08-cr-
01057-CMC-6 (D.S.C. Feb. 21, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.