The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6454•United States of America v. Courtney Floyd Gregory, a/k/a Bobby Lee Graves, a/k/a Deangelo D. Marsh, a/k/a…
12-6454Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 19, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6454
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
COURTNEY FLOYD GREGORY, a/k/a Bobby Lee Graves, a/k/a
Deangelo D. Marsh, a/k/a Marcello N. Williams,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (4:96-cr-00022-RAJ-I)
Submitted: June 12, 2012 Decided: June 19, 2012
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Courtney Floyd Gregory, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Courtney Floyd Gregory appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for
reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Gregory, No.
4:96-cr-00022-RAJ-I (E.D. Va. Feb. 10, 2012). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.