The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6444•Benord Angelo Burrell v. Warden Roderick R. Sowers, et al
12-6444Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 7, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6444
BENORD ANGELO BURRELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN RODERICK R. SOWERS, et al; GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary
of D.P.S.C.S.; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner of
Correction; KEITH L. LYONS, Assistant Warden; DICKERSON,
Lt., Intelligence/Security Officer; AMBROSE, Lt.,
Intelligence Officer; MILLER, Case Management Specialist;
JOHN ROWLEY, Warden, North Branch Correctional Institution;
JAMES K. HOLWAGER, Ph.D.; RICHARD GRIAHAM, Assistant Warden;
THOMAS, Lt.; MR. LILLER, Case Management Supervisor; MR.
HOFFMEN, Case Management Specialist; SIRUS, Sgt.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:09-cv-01038-PJM)
Submitted: July 13, 2012 Decided: August 7, 2012
Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benord Angelo Burrell, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane
Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Benord Angelo Burrell appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Burrell v. Sowers, No. 8:09-cv-01038-PJM (D. Md. Feb.
24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.