The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6374•United States of America v. Lionel Elizah Williams
12-6374Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 31, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6374
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LIONEL ELIZAH WILLIAMS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (2:90-cr-00149-JAM-2)
Submitted: May 24, 2012 Decided: May 31, 2012
Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lionel Elizah Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Neil H. MacBride,
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lionel Elizah Williams appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to correct an alleged clerical error
pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Williams, No. 2:90-cr-00149-JAM-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 31, 2012). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.