The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6361•United States of America v. Mario E. Rodriguez, a/k/a “O”
12-6361Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 1, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6361
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARIO E. RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a “O”,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:08-cr-00031-FPS-1)
Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mario E. Rodriguez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mario E. Rodriguez appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006)
seeking a reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Rodriguez, No. 5:08-cr-00031-FPS-1 (N.D.W. Va. filed Jan. 17,
2012 & entered Jan. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.