The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6360•Miguel Angel Delgado v. David Ballard
12-6360Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 7, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6360
MIGUEL ANGEL DELGADO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVID BALLARD; CLARENCE J. RIDER; JAMES MCCLOUD; CHARLENE
SOTAK, Sued in their Official and Individual capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver,
Jr., District Judge. (2:09-cv-01252)
Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 7, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Miguel Angel Delgado, Appellant Pro Se. Dwayne Edward Cyrus,
Jason Eric Wandling, SHUMAN, MCCUSKEY & SLICER, PLLC,
Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Miguel Angel Delgado appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny his motion for appointment of counsel and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Delgado v.
Ballard, No. 2:09-cv-01252 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 10, 2012). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.