The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6326•United States of America v. Joseph Ziadeh
12-6326Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 1, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6326
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOSEPH ZIADEH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:02-cr-00273-JRS-1)
Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Ziadeh, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II,
Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Robert P. McIntosh, Assistant United
States Attorneys, Gregg Robert Nivala, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Ziadeh appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to vacate the district court’s previous order
appointing a receiver for the sale of certain real property. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Ziadeh, No. 3:02-cr-00273-JRS-1 (E.D.
Va. Jan, 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.