The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6324•United States of America v. Reggie Ismel, a/k/a New York Junior
12-6324Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 25, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6324
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
REGGIE ISMEL, a/k/a New York Junior,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon,
Senior District Judge. (3:94-cr-00008-NKM-1)
Submitted: June 21, 2012 Decided: June 25, 2012
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Marlin Ismel, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Urban Baer,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Ismel appeals the district court’s order
construing his pro se letter as a motion for reduction in
sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying relief
on the same. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Ismel, No. 3:94-cr-00008-NKM-1
(W.D. Va. Jan. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.