The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6320•United States of America v. Malik Lucien Eanes, a/k/a Lucien Clarke Watts
12-6320Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 26, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6320
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MALIK LUCIEN EANES, a/k/a Lucien Clarke Watts,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:06-cr-00173-JRS-1)
Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 26, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malik Lucien Eanes, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Childs Ackley,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Sara Elizabeth Chase,
Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Malik Lucien Eanes appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and conclude that
the district court did not abuse its discretion. See United
States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating
standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.