The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6319•United States of America v. Perry Cousins, a/k/a Pzo
12-6319Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 31, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6319
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PERRY COUSINS, a/k/a Pzo,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith,
Chief District Judge. (4:10-cr-00047-RBS-TEM-1)
Submitted: May 24, 2012 Decided: May 31, 2012
Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Perry Cousins, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II,
Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Perry Cousins appeals the district court’s order
denying his pro se motion for the production of trial
transcripts. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Cousins, No. 4:10-cr-00047-
RBS-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.