The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6317•United States of America v. Bernard King, a/k/a Shaborn
12-6317Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 31, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6317
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BERNARD KING, a/k/a Shaborn,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:94-cr-00163-RBS-14)
Submitted: May 24, 2012 Decided: May 31, 2012
Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard King, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bernard King appeals a district court order denying
his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)
(2006). We affirm. Because the amendment in question did not
lower Gore’s Guidelines sentence, we find the district did not
abuse its discretion denying the motion. United States v.
Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (stating standard of
review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.