The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6286•United States of America v. Travis Le-Ron Carrington
12-6286Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 16, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6286
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TRAVIS LE-RON CARRINGTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:00-cr-00388-JRS-2)
Submitted: May 7, 2012 Decided: May 16, 2012
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Travis Le-Ron Carrington, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley
Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Nicholas Stephan
Altimari, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Travis Le-Ron Carrington appeals the district court’s
order denying a reduction in his sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Carrington, No.
3:00-cr-00388-JRS-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2012). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.