The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6256•United States of America v. Reginald Dewayne Jeffries
12-6256Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 1, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6256
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
REGINALD DEWAYNE JEFFRIES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:07-cr-00056-MR-1)
Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Dewayne Jeffries, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Dewayne Jeffries appeals the district court’s
order denying his “Motion for Public Access to CJA Itemization
of Attorney Fees and Services w/Dates.” We have reviewed the
record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Jeffries, No. 1:07-cr-00056-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2012). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.