The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6205•United States of America v. Sean Mckarn, a/k/a Mack
12-6205Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 6, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6205
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
SEAN MCKARN, a/k/a Mack,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:99-cr-00011-FPS-JES-6)
Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sean McKarn, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hugh McWilliams, Jr.,
John Castle Parr, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling,
West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sean McKarn appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error, given that McKarn is ineligible for the
reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of
the district court. United States v. McKarn, No. 5:99-cr-00011-
FPS-JES-6 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.