The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6198•United States of America v. Sonny Lavoris Mack
12-6198Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 26, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6198
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SONNY LAVORIS MACK,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:08-cr-01252-TLW-1; 4:11-cv-02034-TLW)
Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 26, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sonny Lavoris Mack, Appellant Pro Se. Carrie Fisher Sherard,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sonny Lavoris Mack appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011)
motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Mack v. United States, No. 4:08-cr-01252-TLW-1
(D.S.C. Jan. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.