The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6157•United States of America v. Eric L. Jackson, a/k/a Tango
12-6157Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 1, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6157
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ERIC L. JACKSON, a/k/a Tango,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:01-cr-00004-FPS-JES-1)
Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric L. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hugh McWilliams, Jr.,
John Castle Parr, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling,
West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eric L. Jackson appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction in
sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Jackson, No. 5:01-cr-00004-
FPS-JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.