The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6111•United States of America v. Howell W. Woltz
12-6111Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 6, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6111
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HOWELL W. WOLTZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (3:06-cr-00074-WEB-1)
Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Howell W. Woltz, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Theodore Martens,
UNITED STATES SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Washington,
D.C., Kurt William Meyers, Assistant United States Attorney,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Certiorari dismissed, October 1, 2012
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Howell W. Woltz appeals the district court’s order
denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant Woltz leave to proceed on appeal in forma
pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See United States v. Woltz, No. 3:06-cr-00074-WEB-1
(W.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.