The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6105•United States of America v. Christopher Andre Jackmon
12-6105Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 26, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6105
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER ANDRE JACKMON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:04-cr-00104-CMH-1)
Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 26, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Andre Jackmon, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil
Hammerstrom, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Andre Jackmon appeals the district court’s
order denying without an evidentiary hearing his self-styled
“Motion for Specific Performance of Language of Plea
Agreement/Oral Promise(s).” We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jackmon,
No. 1:04-cr-00104-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 21, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.