The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6104•United States of America v. Jeffrey Blake Johnson
12-6104Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 7, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6104
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JEFFREY BLAKE JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones,
District Judge. (3:94-cr-00061-JPJ-5)
Submitted: March 1, 2012 Decided: March 7, 2012
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey Blake Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Blake Johnson appeals the district court’s
orders denying his motion for a reduction in sentence under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
United States v. Johnson, No. 3:94-cr-00061-JPJ-5 (W.D. Va.
Dec. 29, 2011; Dec. 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.