The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6097•United States of America v. Enrique Alfonso Gayle
12-6097Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 10, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6097
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ENRIQUE ALFONSO GAYLE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-2)
Submitted: May 3, 2012 Decided: May 10, 2012
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Enrique Alfonso Gayle, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Enrique Alfonso Gayle appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for correction of clerical error in the
criminal judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
United States v. Gayle, No. 2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-2 (E.D. Va.
filed Dec. 19, 2011; entered Dec. 21, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.