The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6054•David Fitzgerald Lightner v. CHRISTOPHER ZYCH, Warden
12-6054Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 25, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6054
DAVID FITZGERALD LIGHTNER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
CHRISTOPHER ZYCH, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (7:11-cv-00534-SGW-RSB)
Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 25, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Fitzgerald Lightner, Appellant Pro Se. Rick A.
Mountcastle, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David Fitzgerald Lightner, a federal prisoner,
appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28
U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Lightner v. Zych, No. 7:11-cv-00534-SGW-RSB (W.D. Va.
Nov. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.