The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6027•United States of America v. Holly Neil Bennett
12-6027Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 23, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6027
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HOLLY NEIL BENNETT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:08-cr-00078-IMK-JSK-2)
Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Holly Neil Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn Angus Morgan,
Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia;
Stephen Donald Warner, Assistant United States Attorney, Elkins,
West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Holly Neil Bennett appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on Bennett’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion
for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Bennett, No.
1:08-cr-00078-IMK-JSK-2 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 21, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.