The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6000•Henderson L. Hinton v. Roy Cooper
12-6000Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 25, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6000
HENDERSON L. HINTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROY COOPER; ROBIN PENDERGRAFT; PAT J. MATTHEWS; MICHAEL
SUTTON; JOHN H. BENNETT; JOSEPH EDWARD ZESZOTARSKI, JR.;
JEANETTE K. DORAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03039-BO)
Submitted: June 21, 2012 Decided: June 25, 2012
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henderson L. Hinton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Henderson L. Hinton appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Hinton v. Cooper, No.
5:11-ct-03039-BO (E.D. Va. Oct. 31, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.