The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-2527•Vicki A. Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership
12-2527Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 28, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2527
VICKI A. LINDSEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HIGHWOODS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; HRLP NC VA, L.P.;
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.; WESTERN INDUSTRIES-SOUTH, LLC;
JOHN DOE # 1,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:11-cv-00447-HEH-DJN)
Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 28, 2013
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vicki A. Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Alison Wright Feehan, KUTAK
ROCK, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Janeen Beth Koch, KALBAUGH, PFUND
& MESSERSMITH, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Vicki A. Lindsey appeals from the district court’s
orders denying her three separate Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motions
seeking reconsideration of the district court’s order granting
summary judgment for the Defendants in her action alleging
premises liability and negligent application of a banned
substance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Ltd. P’ship, No.
3:11-cv-00447-HEH-DJN (E.D. Va. Dec. 5, 2012, Jan. 3, 2013, &
Jan. 31, 2013). We deny Lindsey’s motion to supplement the
record on appeal and her motion to recuse several judges of this
court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.