Thomas L. Switzer v. Sergeant Dean, a/k/a Officer Dean

12-2455Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 28, 2013

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2455
THOMAS L. SWITZER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT DEAN, a/k/a Officer Dean,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
TOWN OF STANLEY; MAYOR DOUG PURDHAM; OFFICER BROWN; MARK
BELTON, Page County Administrator; JOHN THOMAS, Sheriff;
DEPUTY HAMMER; PAGE COUNTY JAIL,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:11-cv-00021-MFU-JGW)
Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: March 28, 2013
Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas L. Switzer, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Hustis Milnor,
TAYLOR ZUNKA MILNOR & CARTER, LTD, Charlottesville, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas L. Switzer appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for transcripts. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Switzer v. Sergeant Dean,
No. 5:11-cv-00021-MFU-JGW (W.D. Va. filed Nov. 19 & entered
Nov. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.