The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-2435•Molli Trish Cabrera; Darlene Elizabeth Carter v. Donta Cornelius Brown; Western Express, Incorporated
12-2435Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 2, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2435
MOLLI TRISH CABRERA; DARLENE ELIZABETH CARTER,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
DONTA CORNELIUS BROWN; WESTERN EXPRESS, INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Stephanie A. Gallagher, Magistrate
Judge. (1:12-cv-00041-SAG)
Submitted: April 29, 2013 Decided: May 2, 2013
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Solomon M. Sterenberg, STEIN SPERLING BENNETT DEJONG DRISCOLL,
PC, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellants. Charles B. Peoples,
THOMAS, THOMAS & HAFER, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Molli Trish Cabrera and Darlene Elizabeth Carter
(“Appellants”) appeal the magistrate judge’s sanctions order and
the order granting summary judgment in favor of Donta Cornelius
Brown and Western Express, Incorporated in Appellants’ civil
action.∗ We have reviewed the parties briefs and the joint
appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Cabrera v.
Brown, No. 1:12-cv-00041-SAG (D. Md. Aug. 28 & Sept. 17, 2012).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by
the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.