The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-2344•Jerel Shaw v. Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership
12-2344Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 1, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2344
JEREL SHAW,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ARAMARK MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:11-cv-00483-REP)
Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 1, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerel Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine Lee Hoekman, MORGAN
LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jerel Shaw appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his employment discrimination complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shaw v.
Aramark Mgmt. Servs. Ltd. P’ship, No. 3:11-cv-00483-REP (E.D.
Va. Oct. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.