The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-2283•Earles M. Craddock v. KEITH WHITE, Attorney
12-2283Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 24, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2283
EARLES M. CRADDOCK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
KEITH WHITE, Attorney,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:12-cv-00074-IMK-JSK)
Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earles M. Craddock, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Earles M. Craddock appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing Craddock’s civil action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Craddock v. White, No.
1:12-cv-00074-IMK-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 10, 2012). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.