The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-2248•Walter Ferguson; Charlene Ferguson v. Option One Mortgage Corporation, now known as Sand Canyon Corporation
12-2248Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 12, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2248
WALTER FERGUSON; CHARLENE FERGUSON,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, now known as Sand Canyon
Corporation; AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING,
INCORPORATED, servicing agent for U.S. Bank, NA; U.S. BANK,
N.A., trustee for STRUCTURED ASSET MANAGEMENT SECURITIES
CORPORATION; STRUCTURED ASSET MANAGEMENT SECURITIES
CORPORATION; AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC, as signatory for
MORTGAGE ASSET PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-BC6;
MORTGAGE ASSET PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-BC6,
an asset-backed securitized mortgage pool; SHAPIRO AND
INGLE, LLP; ANDREW HAYES, trustee,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00670-CCE-LPA)
Submitted: February 25, 2013 Decided: March 12, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter Ferguson, Charlene Ferguson, Appellants Pro Se. Brett
Michael Shockley, MCGUIRE WOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina;
Megan E. Miller, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, LLP, Charlotte, North
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Carolina; Jason Kenneth Purser, SHAPIRO & INGLE LLP, Charlotte,
North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Walter and Charlene Ferguson appeal the district
court’s order dismissing their complaint for failure to state a
claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Ferguson v.
Option One Mtg. Corp., No. 1:11-cv-00670-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C.
Sept. 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.