The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-2235•William A. Taccino v. Bank of America, successor to LaSalle Bank National Assoc.
12-2235Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 7, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2235
WILLIAM A. TACCINO,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, successor to LaSalle Bank National Assoc.;
DANIEL J. TOBIN; BALLARD & SPAHR, LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-02677-RDB)
Submitted: January 30, 2013 Decided: February 7, 2013
Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William A. Taccino, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William A. Taccino appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a claim. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Taccino v. Bank of America, No. 1:12-cv-02677-RDB (D.
Md. Sept. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.