The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-2118•Adol T. Owen-Williams, Jr. v. Christopher Cyran, (7816); City of Gaithersburg, Incorporated
12-2118Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 24, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2118
ADOL T. OWEN-WILLIAMS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHRISTOPHER CYRAN, (#7816); CITY OF GAITHERSBURG,
INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:11-cv-03354-PJM)
Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adol T. Owen-Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Bock
Karpinski, Michael B. Rynd, KARPINSKI, COLARESI & KARP, PA,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Adol T. Owen-Williams, Jr., seeks to appeal the
district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981,
1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Owen-Williams v. Cyran, No. 8:11-cv-
03354-PJM (D. Md. July 24 & Aug. 30, 2012). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.