The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-2099•Brad R. Johnson v. HORRY, COUNTY OF, State of South Carolina
12-2099Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 12, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2099
BRAD R. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HORRY, COUNTY OF, State of South Carolina; HUBERT MISHOE;
JANET CARTER; JOHN WEAVER; TAMMY BARNHILL; BRENDA L. GORSKI,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (4:09-cv-01758-JMC)
Submitted: February 5, 2013 Decided: February 12, 2013
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brad R. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jerome Scott Kozacki,
WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brad R. Johnson appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting
summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his complaint.
We have considered Johnson’s arguments on appeal, reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. County of
Horry, No. 4:09-cv-01758-JMC (D.S.C. Aug. 8, 2012). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.