The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-2089•Kenneth L. Holbert, Jr. v. Greenville Technical College
12-2089Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 24, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2089
KENNETH L. HOLBERT, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GREENVILLE TECHNICAL COLLEGE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:11-cv-02846-HMH)
Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth L. Holbert, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles J. Boykin,
Kimberly Ann Gertner, BOYKIN & DAVIS, LLC, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth L. Holbert, Jr. appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss his civil action. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Holbert v. Greenville Technical Coll., No. 6:11-cv-
02846-HMH (D.S.C. July 18, 2012). We deny Holbert’s motion to
strike Appellee’s informal response brief. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.