The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1938•Jonathan Williams v. Pepperidge Farm, Incorporated
12-1938Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 24, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1938
JONATHAN WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PEPPERIDGE FARM, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-01107-TLW)
Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jonathan Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Danny Michael Henthorne,
LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Williams appeals from the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting summary judgment for Pepperidge Farm, Inc., in
Williams’ employment discrimination action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v.
Pepperidge Farm, Inc., No. 1:10-cv-01107-TLW (D.S.C. June 15,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.