The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1909•Terrence Leroy Wright v. Wanda Brooms
12-1909Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 29, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1909
TERRENCE LEROY WRIGHT,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
WANDA BROOMS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Martin K.
Reidinger, District Judge. (2:11-mc-00003-MR-DLH)
Submitted: November 19, 2012 Decided: November 29, 2012
Before AGEE, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terrence Leroy Wright, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Terrence Leroy Wright appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his civil action as frivolous. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Wright v. Brooms, No. 2:11-mc-00003-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. May 30,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.