The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1906•Resa McCrae v. Shoppers Food Warehouse Corp.
12-1906Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 11, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1906
RESA MCCRAE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHOPPERS FOOD WAREHOUSE CORP.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Beth P. Gesner, Magistrate Judge.
(1:11-cv-01368-BPG)
Submitted: December 26, 2012 Decided: January 11, 2013
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Ledyard-Marks, LAW OFFICE OF BARRY R. GLAZER, P.C.,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Mark A. Kohl, DECARO,
DORAN, SICILIANO, GALLAGHER & DEBLASIS, LLP, Bowie, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Resa McCrae appeals the magistrate judge’s order∗
granting summary judgment in favor of Shoppers Food Warehouse
Corp. ("Shoppers"), in her civil action alleging negligence.
McCrae argues that there is a genuine dispute of material fact
as to whether a dangerous condition existed on Shoppers’
premises, whether Shoppers created the dangerous condition, and
whether Shoppers had constructive knowledge of the dangerous
condition. Our review of the record and the briefs filed by the
parties discloses no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
magistrate judge. McCrae v. Shoppers Food Warehouse Corp., No.
1:11-cv-01368-BPG (D. Md. June 27, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ With the consent of the parties, the magistrate judge
exercised jurisdiction over this litigation, as authorized by 28
U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2006).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.