The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1900•In re: RONALD WAYNE WALKER, SR; LISA ANN WALKER; JANET M. NESSE v. UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Trustee -
12-1900Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 26, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1900
In re: RONALD WAYNE WALKER, SR; LISA ANN WALKER; JANET M.
NESSE,
Debtors,
----------------------------------
v.
ELIZABETH ANNE REEVES, Counsel for Debtors,
Debtor – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES TRUSTEE,
Trustee – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:12-cv-00918-AW; 11-19737; 11-20840; 11-26340; 12-
11149)
Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Elizabeth Anne Reeves, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph
Schneider, Jr., UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C.; Gerard Richard Vetter, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRUSTEE, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Elizabeth Anne Reeves appeals the district court’s
orders: (1) dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s
order for failure to comply with Bankr. R. 8009; and (2) denying
her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave
to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Reeves v. United States Trustee,
Nos. 8:12-cv-00918-AW; 11-19737; 11-20840; 11-26340; 12-11149
(D. Md. June 6, 2012; June 29, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.