The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1849•Sandra Robinson v. Nielsen Tv Ratings
12-1849Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 19, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1849
SANDRA ROBINSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
NIELSEN TV RATINGS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:10-cv-00009-JRS)
Submitted: January 28, 2013 Decided: March 19, 2013
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sandra Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. John M. Barr, Crystal L.
Norrick, JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sandra Robinson appeals the district court’s order
denying her motion to file a belated appeal. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v.
Nielsen TV Ratings, No. 3:10-cv-00009-JRS (E.D. Va. June 19,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.