The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1816•Griffin Austin v. United States Government
12-1816Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 24, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1816
GRIFFIN AUSTIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-01065-CCB)
Submitted: August 22, 2012 Decided: August 24, 2012
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Griffin Austin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Griffin Austin appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Austin v. U.S. Gov’t,
No. 1:12-cv-01065-CCB (D. Md. May 1, 2012). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.