Catherine Denise Randolph v. Douglas Gansler; William F. Brockman

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1793
CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DOUGLAS GANSLER; WILLIAM F. BROCKMAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:12-cv-01466-JFM)
Submitted: October 11, 2012 Decided: October 15, 2012
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint
and denying her subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Randolph v. Gansler, No. 1:12-cv-01466-JFM (D. Md. May
24, 2012, June 11, 2012). We deny as moot Randolph’s motion to
expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --