The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1707•Helen C. Newman, Private Investigator; Maria A. Newman, U.s. Army v. General Services Corporation
12-1707Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 13, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1707
HELEN C. NEWMAN, PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR; MARIA A. NEWMAN,
U.S. ARMY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:11-cv-00783-REP)
Submitted: September 11, 2012 Decided: September 13, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Helen C. Newman, Maria A. Newman, Appellants Pro Se. Julie
Smith Palmer, Stanley Paul Wellman, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN &
WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Helen C. Newman and Maria A. Newman appeal the
district court’s order dismissing their civil action for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed
in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated
by the district court. Newman v. Gen. Servs. Corp., No. 3:11-
cv-00783-REP (E.D. Va. May 22, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.