The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1698•Cynthia G. Smith v. SULLIVAN MCGRAW; JACQUELINE MCGRAW; NEW LIFE WORSHIP CENTER, Church Board and Membership
12-1698Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 1, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1698
CYNTHIA G. SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SULLIVAN MCGRAW; JACQUELINE MCGRAW; NEW LIFE WORSHIP CENTER,
Church Board and Membership,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
THE POTOMAC DISTRICT OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:10-cv-02310-AW)
Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cynthia G. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Barry Bach, Kimya B.
Thomas, PESSIN KATZ LAW, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cynthia G. Smith appeals the magistrate judge’s and
district court’s various pretrial orders, the district court’s
order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this
civil action, and a subsequent order denying Smith’s motions for
reconsideration and recusal. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. McGraw, No.
8:10-cv-02310-AW (D. Md. Aug. 30, 2011; Oct. 4, 2011; Oct. 7,
2011; Nov. 2, 2011, Feb. 23, 2012 & May 1, 2012). We grant
Smith’s motions to extend time to file a reply brief, to
consolidate appeals, and to file a corrected informal brief, but
deny her motion to amend/correct record. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.