The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1490•Cynthia Gayle Smith v. Timothy Purnell
12-1490Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 20, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1490
CYNTHIA GAYLE SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TIMOTHY PURNELL,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00922-JCC-IDD)
Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 20, 2012
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cynthia Gayle Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Mikhael David Charnoff,
Danny Mark Howell, Courtney South Schorr, SANDS ANDERSON, PC,
McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cynthia Gayle Smith appeals the district court’s
orders denying her motion to amend her civil complaint,
dismissing the complaint, and denying reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith
v. Purnell, No. 1:11-cv-00922-JCC-IDD (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2011 &
Mar. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.