John R. Clark v. Vernon Russell; Law Firm of Plummer, Belo & Russell, Pa; Footlocker, Inc.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1489
JOHN R. CLARK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VERNON RUSSELL; LAW FIRM OF PLUMMER, BELO & RUSSELL, PA;
FOOTLOCKER, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00526-CCE-LPA)
Submitted: August 22, 2012 Decided August 24, 2012
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John R. Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Paul Booth, III,
Gabrielle Amber Pittman, SHARPLESS & STAVOLA, PA, Greensboro,
North Carolina; Kerry Anne Shad, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT,
DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
John R. Clark appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Clark v. Russell, No.
1:11-cv-00526-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2012). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --